Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges (2024)

research-article

Authors: Jaclyn Abraham, Rebecca Roth, Heidi Zinzow, Kapil Chalil Madathil, and Pamela Wisniewski

Transactions on Social Computing, Volume 5, Issue 1-4

Article No.: 3, Pages 1 - 34

Published: 26 November 2022 Publication History

  • 4citation
  • 1,229
  • Downloads

Metrics

Total Citations4Total Downloads1,229

Last 12 Months697

Last 6 weeks48

  • Get Citation Alerts

    New Citation Alert added!

    This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:

    You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.

    To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.

    Manage my Alerts

    New Citation Alert!

    Please log in to your account

  • Get Access

      • Get Access
      • References
      • Media
      • Tables
      • Share

    Abstract

    Viral social media challenges have erupted across multiple social media platforms. While social media users participate in prosocial challenges designed to support good causes, like the Ice Bucket Challenge, some challenges (e.g., Cinnamon Challenge) can also potentially be dangerous. To understand the influential factors, experiences, and reflections of young adults who participated in a viral social media challenge in the past, we conducted interviews with 30 college students (ages 18–27). We applied behavioral contagion theory as a qualitative lens to understand whether this theory could help explain the factors that contributed to their participation. We found that behavior contagion theory was useful but not fully able to explain how and why young social media users engaged in viral challenges. Thematic analyses uncovered that overt social influence and intrinsic factors (i.e., social pressure, entertainment value, and attention-seeking) also played a key role in challenge participation. Additionally, we identified divergent patterns between prosocial and potentially risky social media challenges. Those who participated in prosocial challenges appeared to be more socially motivated as they saw more similarities between themselves and the individuals that they observed performing the challenges and were more likely to be directly encouraged by their friends to participate. In contrast, those who performed potentially risky challenges often did not see similarities with other challenge participants, nor did they receive direct encouragement from peers; yet, half of these participants said they would not have engaged in the challenge had they been more aware of the potential for physical harm. We consider the benefits and risks that viral social media challenges present for young adults with the intent of optimizing these interactions by mitigating risks, rather than discouraging them altogether.

    References

    [1]

    Adam D. I. Kramer. 2012. The spread of emotion via Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

    Digital Library

    [2]

    Icek Ajzen. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control. Springer, 11–39.

    [3]

    Sinan Aral, Lev Muchnik, and Arun Sundararajan. 2009. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from hom*ophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 51 (2009), 21544–21549. DOI:

    [4]

    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett. 2000. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Amer. Psychol. 55, 5 (2000), 469–480. DOI:

    [5]

    C. Daniel Batson and Adam A. Powell. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Handbook of Psychology. 463–484.

    [6]

    Diana Baumrind. 1987. A developmental perspective on adolescent risk taking in contemporary America. New Direct. Child Adolesc. Dev. 37 (1987), 93–125. DOI:

    [7]

    Jonah Berger. 2016. Contagious: Why Things Catch On. Simon and Schuster.

    [8]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. DOI:

    [9]

    Adam Burgess, Vincent Miller, and Sarah Moore. 2018. Prestige, performance and social pressure in viral challenge memes: Neknomination, the Ice-Bucket challenge and SmearForSmear as imitative encounters. Sociology 52, 5 (2018), 1035–1051. DOI:

    [10]

    Danielle Lottridge, Frank Bentley, Matt Wheeler, Jason Lee, Janet Cheung, Katherine Ong, and Cristy Rowley. 2017. Third-wave livestreaming: Teens’ long form selfie. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services.

    Digital Library

    [11]

    Eugen Dimant. 2015. On peer effects: Behavioral contagion of (un)ethical behavior and the role of social identity. Retrieved https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/68732.html.

    [12]

    Michele P. Dyson, Lisa Hartling, Jocelyn Shulhan, Annabritt Chisholm, Andrea Milne, Purnima Sundar, Shannon D. Scott, and Amanda S. Newton. 2016. A systematic review of social media use to discuss and view deliberate self-harm acts. PLoS One 11, 5 (May 2016), e0155813. DOI:

    [13]

    Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: Interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3307–3316.

    Digital Library

    [14]

    Roni Factor, Ichiro Kawachi, and David R. Williams. 2011. Understanding high-risk behavior among non-dominant minorities: A social resistance framework. Soc. Sci. Med. 73, 9 (November 2011), 1292–1301. DOI:

    [15]

    Jonathan L. Freedman, Joanna Birsky, and Ann Cavoukian. 1980. Environmental determinants of behavioral contagion: Density and number. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1, 2 (1980), 155–161. DOI:

    [16]

    Erving Goffman. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, 1st ed. Anchor, New York, NY.

    [17]

    Amelia Grant-Alfieri, Judy Schaechter, and Steven E. Lipshultz. 2013. Ingesting and aspirating dry cinnamon by children and adolescents: The “Cinnamon Challenge.” Pediatrics 131, 5 (2013), 833–835. DOI:

    [18]

    Rosanna E. Guadagno, Daniel M. Rempala, Shannon Murphy, and Bradley M. Okdie. 2013. What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 6 (2013), 2312–2319. DOI:

    Digital Library

    [19]

    Vinu Ilakkuvan, Amanda Johnson, Andrea C. Villanti, W. Douglas Evans, and Monique Turner. 2019. Patterns of social media use and their relationship to health risks among young adults. J. Adolesc. Health 64, 2 (2019), 158–164. DOI:

    [20]

    Stephanie Jarvi, Benita Jackson, Lance Swenson, and Heather Crawford. 2013. The impact of social contagion on non-suicidal self-injury: A review of the literature. Arch. Suicide Res. 17, 1 (2013), 1–19. DOI:

    [21]

    Jessica Pater and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2017. Defining digital self-harm. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.

    Digital Library

    [22]

    Rebecca M. Jones, Leah H. Somerville, Jian Li, Erika J. Ruberry, Victoria Libby, Gary Glover, Henning U. Voss, Douglas J. Ballon, and B. J. Casey. 2011. Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning. J. Neurosci. 31, 37 (2011), 13039–13045. DOI:

    [23]

    Jukka Jouhki, Epp Lauk, Maija Penttinen, Niina Sormanen, and Turo Uskali. 2016. Facebook's emotional contagion experiment as a challenge to research ethics. Media and Communication 4, 4 (Oct. 2016), 11. DOI:

    [24]

    Amro Khasawneh, Kapil Chalil Madathil, Emma Dixon, Pamela Wisniewski, Heidi Zinzow, and Rebecca Roth. 2019. An investigation on the portrayal of blue whale challenge on youtube and twitter. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 887–888. DOI:

    [25]

    Amro Khasawneh, Kapil Chalil Madathil, Heidi Zinzow, Pamela Wisniewski, Amal Ponathil, Hunter Rogers, Sruthy Agnisarman, Rebecca Roth, and Meera Narasimhan. 2021. An investigation of the portrayal of social media challenges on youtube and twitter. Trans. Soc. Comput. 4, 1 (Mar. 2021), 2:1–2:23. DOI:

    Digital Library

    [26]

    Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hanco*ck. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 24 (2014), 8788–8790. DOI:

    [27]

    Ruobing Li and S. Shyam Sundar. 2021. Can interactive media attenuate psychological reactance to health messages? A study of the role played by user commenting and audience metrics in persuasion. Health Commun. 0, 0 (Feb. 2021), 1–13. DOI:

    [28]

    Paul S. Marsden. 1998. Memetics: A new paradigm for understanding customer behaviour and influence. Market. Intell. Plan. 16, 6 (1998), 363–368. DOI:

    [29]

    Philipp Mayring. 2004. Qualitative content analysis. Comp. Qual. Res. 1, 2 (2004), 159–176.

    [30]

    Richa Mukhra, Neha Baryah, Kewal Krishan, and Tanuj Kanchan. 2019. “Blue whale challenge”: A game or crime? Sci. Eng. Ethics 25, 1 (Feb. 2019), 285–291. DOI:

    [31]

    Karine Nahon and Jeff Hemsley. 2013. Going Viral, 1st ed. Polity, Cambridge, UK.

    Digital Library

    [32]

    Dr. Rashad Yazdanifard and Agnes Ng May Phing. 2014. How does ALS Ice bucket challenge achieve its viral outcome through marketing via social media? Global J. Manage. Bus. Res. 14, 7 (Dec. 2014).

    [33]

    Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3 (2019), Article 72. DOI:

    Digital Library

    [34]

    Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, Daniel F. Perkins, and John M. Carroll. 2016. Dear Diary: Teens reflect on their weekly online risk experiences. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3919–3930.

    Digital Library

    [35]

    Norman Polansky, Ronald Lippitt, and Fritz Redl. 1950. An investigation of behavioral contagion in groups. Hum. Rel. 3, (1950), 319–348. DOI:

    [36]

    Geah Pressgrove, Brooke Weberling McKeever, and S. Mo Jang. 2018. What is contagious? Exploring why content goes viral on Twitter: A case study of the ALS ice bucket challenge. Int. J. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Market. 23, 1 (2018). DOI:

    [37]

    Rebecca Roth, Jaclyn Abraham, Heidi Zinzow, Pamela Wisniewski, Amro Khasawneh, and Kapil Chalil Madathil. 2020. Evaluating news media reports on the “Blue Whale Challenge” for adherence to suicide prevention safe messaging guidelines. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4 (2020), Article 26. DOI:

    Digital Library

    [38]

    Robert B. Cialdini and Noah J. Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 1 (2004), 591–621. DOI:

    [39]

    Tony D. Sampson. 2012. Virality: Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks. University of Minnesota Press.

    [40]

    Malinen Sanna and Koivula Aki. 2020. Influencers and targets on social media: Investigating the impact of network hom*ogeneity and group identification on online influence. First Monday 25, 4 (25 2020). DOI:

    [41]

    Evan Selinger and Woodrow Hartzog. 2016. Facebook's emotional contagion study and the ethical problem of co-opted identity in mediated environments where users lack control. Res. Ethics 12, 1 (2016), 35–43. DOI:

    [42]

    Bogdan State and Lada Adamic. 2015. The diffusion of support in an online social movement: Evidence from the adoption of equal-sign profile pictures. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’15), ACM, 1741–1750. DOI:

    Digital Library

    [43]

    Louisa Stein, Henry Jenkins, Sam Ford, Joshua Green, Paul Booth, Kristina Busse, Melissa Click, Xiaochang Li, and Sharon Ross. 2014. Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. Cinema J. 53, 3 (2014), 152–177.

    [44]

    Stevie Chancellor, Jessica Annette Pater, Trustin Clear, Eric Gilbert, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. #thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-Eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.

    Digital Library

    [45]

    Shinsuke Suzuki, Emily L. S. Jensen, Peter Bossaerts, and John P. O'Doherty. 2016. Behavioral contagion during learning about another agent's risk-preferences acts on the neural representation of decision-risk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 14 (2016), 3755–3760.

    [46]

    Duncan J. Watts. 2004. The “New” Science of Networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 1 (2004), 243–270. DOI:

    [47]

    Ladd Wheeler. 1966. Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychol. Rev. 73, 2 (1966), 179–192. DOI:

    [48]

    Egypt Today Staff. 2018. Kiki challenge dancing forbidden by law in egypt. EgyptToday. Retrieved from https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/54514/Kiki-Challenge-Dancing-forbidden-by-law-in-Egypt.

    [49]

    Ant Adeane. 2019. Blue Whale: What is the truth behind an online “suicide challenge”? BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46505722.

    [50]

    Amelia Tate. 2021. Only 86 teens ate Tide Pods, so why did the world erupt in moral panic? New Statesman. Retrieved from https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/2018/01/only-86-teens-ate-tide-pods-so-why-did-world-erupt-moral-panic.

    [51]

    Kate Fowler. 2021. TikTok bans “devious licks” trend which saw high school students arrested. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/tiktok-devious-licks-trend-banned-app-unsearchable-hashtag-1630270.

    [52]

    ALS Association. 2021. Ice Bucket Challenge dramatically accelerated the fight against ALS | The ALS Association. Retrieved from https://www.als.org/stories-news/ice-bucket-challenge-dramatically-accelerated-fight-against-als.

    [53]

    Lindsey Bever. 2021. Teens are daring each other to eat Tide pods. We don't need to tell you that's a bad idea. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/01/13/teens-are-daring-each-other-to-eat-tide-pods-we-dont-need-to-tell-you-thats-a-bad-idea/.

    [54]

    Hyunyi Cho and Kim Witte. 2005. Managing Fear in Public Health Campaigns: A Theory-Based Formative Evaluation Process -. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1524839904263912?casa_token=OCvkEUuvuS4AAAAA:jpO9ltCwyBy-vDQehqmAPX5m7xkKnsKjGlCsjh28AGNab-urPUV4i5z02zyj_x38OeBLmIfCsf-5.

    [55]

    Raisa Bruner. 2021. YouTube has banned dangerous pranks and challenges. Time. Retrieved from https://time.com/5504295/youtube-bans-challenges/.

    [56]

    Wall Street Journal. 2021. The facebook files. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039.

    Cited By

    View all

    • Ali NQadir SAlsoubai ADe Choudhury MRazi AWisniewski P(2024)"I'm gonna KMS": From Imminent Risk to Youth Joking about Suicide and Self-Harm via Social MediaProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642489(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

      https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642489

    • Killoran JJenkin TManseau J(2023)ICT Interactions and COVID-19 – A Theorization Across Two Pandemic WavesACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/359793814:4(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023

      https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597938

    • Patel RPathak MJain ALagman J(2023)Bringing to light the TikTok Benadryl challenge: A case of seizure from Benadryl overdosePsychiatry Research Case Reports10.1016/j.psycr.2022.1000872:1(100087)Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges

      1. Human-centered computing

        1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

          1. HCI theory, concepts and models

      Recommendations

      • Examining social media use among older adults

        HT '13: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media

        Social media is a powerful tool that can connect family and friends across long distances as well as link people with similar interests. Social media has been widely adopted by younger adults, but older adults have been less likely to use such ...

        Read More

      • Characterizing participation across social media sites amongst young adults with intellectual disability

        OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

        Young Adults with Intellectual Disability (YAID) are interested in participating in social media as it offers opportunities for their social participation and inclusion. However, the literature remains incomplete on the nature of participation across ...

        Read More

      • Social media and online political participation

        Blog use and SNS use are positively related to online political participation.Like-minded exposure mediates the relationship between blog use and political participation.Cross-cutting exposure mediates the relationship between SNS use and political ...

        Read More

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges (1)

      ACM Transactions on Social Computing Volume 5, Issue 1-4

      December 2022

      103 pages

      EISSN:2469-7826

      DOI:10.1145/3572823

      • Editor:
      • Kevin Crowston

        Syracuse University, USA

      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [emailprotected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 November 2022

      Online AM: 28 July 2022

      Accepted: 12 April 2022

      Revised: 25 February 2022

      Received: 07 May 2021

      Published inTSCVolume 5, Issue 1-4

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Social media
      2. viral challenges
      3. behavioral contagion

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      • National Science Foundation

      Contributors

      Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges (3)

      Other Metrics

      View Article Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 4

        Total Citations

        View Citations
      • 1,229

        Total Downloads

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)697
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)48

      Other Metrics

      View Author Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      • Ali NQadir SAlsoubai ADe Choudhury MRazi AWisniewski P(2024)"I'm gonna KMS": From Imminent Risk to Youth Joking about Suicide and Self-Harm via Social MediaProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642489(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

        https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642489

      • Killoran JJenkin TManseau J(2023)ICT Interactions and COVID-19 – A Theorization Across Two Pandemic WavesACM Transactions on Management Information Systems10.1145/359793814:4(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023

        https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597938

      • Patel RPathak MJain ALagman J(2023)Bringing to light the TikTok Benadryl challenge: A case of seizure from Benadryl overdosePsychiatry Research Case Reports10.1016/j.psycr.2022.1000872:1(100087)Online publication date: Jun-2023
      • Falgoust GWinterlind EMoon PParker AZinzow HChalil Madathil K(2022)Applying the uses and gratifications theory to identify motivational factors behind young adult's participation in viral social media challenges on TikTokHuman Factors in Healthcare10.1016/j.hfh.2022.1000142(100014)Online publication date: Dec-2022

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      Get this Article

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges (2024)

      FAQs

      Applying Behavioral Contagion Theory to Examining Young Adults’ Participation in Viral Social Media Challenges? ›

      We applied behavioral contagion theory as a qualitative lens to understand whether this theory could help explain the factors that contributed to their participation. We found that behavior contagion theory was useful but not fully able to explain how and why young social media users engaged in viral challenges.

      What is the social contagion theory of social media? ›

      The theory suggests that people's thoughts, emotions, and behaviors can be influenced by the people around them, leading to the spread of ideas, attitudes, and behaviors throughout social networks.

      What is the behavioral contagion theory? ›

      A behavior is “contagious” if one person is more likely to exhibit it when a relevant other person has already done so. In this sense, behavioral contagion is commonly thought to contribute to many social problems, such as drug abuse and teenage promiscuity.

      What is the social contagion theory that explains how our people are? ›

      Social contagion occurs when a memory spreads from one individual to one or multiple others via social interaction (Roediger et al., 2001). This “mnemonic spread” is not limited to memories based on shared events, but may involve events and experiences only one party was initially exposed to.

      What is an example of contagion theory in sociology? ›

      The contagion theory states that individuals act irrationally as they come under the hypnotic influence of a crowd. A person may adopt the behaviors of others in a crowd. For example, during a protest a few people start yelling profanities and throwing objects.

      What is an example of social contagion? ›

      Social contagion processes become problematic when they lead to spates of aggressive or self-injurious behaviors. An example of social contagion is the 1962 June Bug, when workers developed all the same psychologically-induced symptoms.

      What is an example of a contagious behavior? ›

      Certain behaviors — like laughing and yawning — can be easier to catch than the cold that's going around your office, according to psychologists. “Behavioral contagion” is a well-documented phenomenon in psychology. Our brains are hardwired for social interaction and bonding.

      What does contagion theory argues? ›

      In short, contagion theory argues that collective behavior is irrational and results from the contagious influence of the crowds in which individuals find themselves. Contagion theory assumes that people in a crowd act emotionally and irrationally because they come under the influence of the crowd's impulses.

      What is social contagion in psychology today? ›

      Social contagion manifests mainly in two ways: how we feel (emotional contagion) and how we act (behavioral contagion). Research has shown people's propensity for emotional contagion. Our facial expressions and movements tend to increasingly coordinate in a crowd using facial, vocal, and postural mimicry.

      What are the principles of social contagion? ›

      The Six Principles or STEPPS – Social Currency, Triggers, Emotion, Public, Practical Value, and Stories.

      What does it mean that social networks can influence people through contagion? ›

      Social networks can influence people through contagion. What does that mean? People who are connected to social networks are more likely to be affected by them.

      What is the law of contagion in social psychology? ›

      Edwin Tylor (1879), James Frazer (1895), and Marcel Mauss (1902) proposed three laws of sympathetic magic that they took to be universal principles of thinking. The law of contagion holds that “once in contact, always in contact”; when objects make physical contact, essences may be permanently transferred.

      What is social interaction theory in social media? ›

      Social interactionist theory studies how people interact in social settings. This knowledge of social interaction can be crucial when communicating with your potential or current customers. You can apply this theory to any social network, not just social media—any platform that offers a way of connecting people.

      What is an example of media contagion? ›

      Media contagion as it applies to public mass shootings (Gould, 1980; Johnston & Joy, 2016) refers to the high likelihood of sensa- tionalized coverage of a violent act, such as the Columbine, Sandy Hook, Mandalay Bay, or Virginia Tech incidents, often leading to a similar incident within the first 14 days.

      What is the social media involvement theory? ›

      Social media engagement theory refers to the concept that individuals engage with content on social media platforms through active participation and interaction.

      What are the three theories of social that describe social media? ›

      They help us make sense of the complex relationships between users, content, networks, and technology. Some of the most common theories in social media include the Social Capital Theory, the Network Effects Theory, the Cultivation Theory, and the Spiral of Silence Theory.

      References

      Top Articles
      Latest Posts
      Article information

      Author: Kieth Sipes

      Last Updated:

      Views: 6276

      Rating: 4.7 / 5 (67 voted)

      Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

      Author information

      Name: Kieth Sipes

      Birthday: 2001-04-14

      Address: Suite 492 62479 Champlin Loop, South Catrice, MS 57271

      Phone: +9663362133320

      Job: District Sales Analyst

      Hobby: Digital arts, Dance, Ghost hunting, Worldbuilding, Kayaking, Table tennis, 3D printing

      Introduction: My name is Kieth Sipes, I am a zany, rich, courageous, powerful, faithful, jolly, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.